jump to navigation

Rip Van Winkle’s blog May 18, 2013

Posted by Geekgirl in A Biologist Speaks.
add a comment

Holy cow. I cannot believe how many nice questions and comments I have received. And yes, I took a break from blogging. I kind of took a break from life, dealing with many issues.

My apologies for not responding to folks. I deeply appreciate everyone’s passion for this topic, both scientific and for the dignity of human rights.

 

I’m still on hiatus. For those of you that expressed an interest in helping with the blog, I would LOVE to let someone else drive while I sleep! (Melissa Etheridge reference there, in case you didn’t recognize the lyrics from one of her songs).

 

Geekgirl

Advertisements

A Biologist Speaks about Parenting Research April 3, 2010

Posted by Geekgirl in A Biologist Speaks.
Tags:
add a comment

The February issue of Journal of Marriage and Family is available online for free. Unfortunately, when I try to create a link, I get an error message. Fortunately, I’m able to attach the articles. The lead articles are very positive and show only small, inconsequential differences in parenting. Two moms tend to parent like, wait for it, moms. In fact, two moms are better than heterosexual parents. There is less data for gay men but in general they do just fine thank you. They care for their children in the way that we think of a traditional mom as well as the way we think of traditional dads. Ultimately, the lead article concludes that parents are individuals first.

The notion that children need a mom and a dad is tied to stereotyping men and women’s parenting styles. I find that sad and reflective of a conservative culture that wants to restrict all people. Our notion of the ideal family where mom stays home and dad goes to work, everyone is happy in the Leave It To Beaver world never existed. We simply went into denial about our dysfunctional families. It was so much easier to pretend that we were the families on television.

I encourage you to go to the journals website and check out the February issue. Several articles provide different view points on same sex couples as parents.

While I found all of the articles to be of interest, including the different opinons of researchers, I began to realize that the researchers who believe heterosexual parents are the best are truly grasping at straws. Some have become aware of how other hidden biases have influenced the interpretation of data. Some have not.

So what doesn’t this issue cover? Easy. That each of us, regardless of gender, sexual orientation, is an individual. There is no discussion of how children are harmed in heterosexual unions. Child abuse, neglect, parents that are just too busy, parents who cheat, parents who get divorced, teenage motherhood. We all know that there is a huge range of what children experience in heterosexual marriages.

The microscopic examination seeking out the smallest deficiency in same sex parenting is major overkill and symptomatic of a homophobic society. It is also futile as the data simply is not there. ┬áIf we really are concerned about our children, let’s focus on giving all parents the skills, support and resources that they need.

NARTH Misuses Scientific Research December 26, 2009

Posted by Geekgirl in A Biologist Speaks, psychology.
2 comments

Dr. Milton Diamond and Transgender Research December 23, 2009

Posted by Geekgirl in A Biologist Speaks, Commentary, Gender Identity, LGBT, medical, Resources, transgender, transsexual.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

If you have not heard of Professor Milton Diamond at the University of Hawaii, you really should check out his research. He is one of the leading researchers in the field of transgender and intersex science. His website also has links to a large number of resources for LGBT folks.

“Nature loves variety. Society hates it”

Arguments against Same Sex Marriage #1 November 15, 2009

Posted by Geekgirl in A Biologist Speaks, LGBT, social.
Tags: ,
4 comments

Today’s blog is an editorial. As I continue to explore both LGBT research and what is happening in our society, I think that the viewpoint of a biologist can be added to the debate. I speak only for myself. All statistics here are provided by the Guttmacher Institute and Center for Disease Control.

Marriage is for Procreation (more…)